PFAFFIAN Differential Equations And It's Solutions
PFAFFIAN Differential Equations And It's Solutions :-
The relation
n
Σ Fᵢ(x₁,x₂,......xₙ) dxᵢ = 0
i=1
where Fᵢ's (i=1,2,....n) are functions of all or some of the n independent variables x₁,x₂,.....xₙ is called a Pfaffian differential equation . Here we shall study Pfaffian differential equation in three independent variables which is of the form
P dx + Q dy + R dz = 0 ...........(1)
where P, Q , R are functions of x , y and z . Setting --> -->
X = (P,Q,R) and dr = (dx,dy,dz), equation (1) can be written in the vector notation as
--> -->
X . dr = 0 ..............(2)
If there exists a function μ(x,y,z) such that μ(P dx + Q dy + R dz) is an exact differential dΦ , the equation is said to be integrable and to possess an integrating factor μ(x,y,z) . In such case(1) becomes
dΦ = 0
which on integration yields
Φ(x,y,z) = c ..................(3)
The function Φ is called the primitive and the relation (3) is called the solution of the differential equation . In general all equations of the form (1) may not possess of equation (1) . This is contained in the following theorem .
Before going to state the theorem first we shall prove two Lemmas .
dΦ = 0
which on integration yields
Φ(x,y,z) = c ..................(3)
The function Φ is called the primitive and the relation (3) is called the solution of the differential equation . In general all equations of the form (1) may not possess of equation (1) . This is contained in the following theorem .
Before going to state the theorem first we shall prove two Lemmas .
Lemma 1 :
If two functions u(x,y) and v(x,y) satisfy the relation ∂(u,v) / ∂(x,y) = 0 then there exists between them a relation F(u,v) =0 , not involving x or y explicitly .
Proof :
Eliminating y between the equations
u= u(x,y) , v = v(x,y) ............(4)
we obtain a relation
F(u,v,x) = 0 ....................(5)
Differentiating (6) with respect to x and y respectively we obtain ,
∂F/∂x + ∂F/∂u ∂u/∂x + ∂F/∂v ∂v/∂x = 0
and ∂F/∂u ∂u/∂y + ∂F/∂v ∂v/∂y = 0
Elimination of ∂F/∂v from these equations yields
∂F/∂x ∂v/∂y+
(∂u/∂x ∂v/∂y - ∂u/∂y ∂v/∂x) ∂F/∂u = 0
⇒ ∂F/∂x ∂v/∂y +∂(u,v)/∂(x,y) ∂F/∂u = 0
Using the given condition this equation reduces to
∂F/∂x ∂v/∂y = 0 ......................(6)
Since v is a function of both x and y , ∂v/∂y ≠ 0 . So equation(7) implies
∂F/∂x = 0
which shows that F does not contain x explicitly and hence (6) may be written as
F(u,v ) = 0 (Proved)
Lemma 2 :
-->
If X is a vector and μ is an arbitrary function of x,y,z then
--> -->
X . curl X = 0
--> -->
if and only if (μ X ) . curl (μ X ) = 0 .
Proof :
Suppose first that X . curl X = 0 and
-->
left X = (P,Q,R) , then
--> -->
(μ X ) . curl (μ Χ ) = μP{∂(μR)/∂y) - ∂(μQ)/∂z}
+μQ{∂(μP)/∂z - ∂(μR)/∂x}
+ μR{∂(μQ)/∂x - ∂(μp)/∂y}
= μ²{P(∂R/∂y - ∂Q/∂z) + Q(∂P/∂z - ∂R/∂x)
+ R(∂Q/∂x - ∂P/∂y)}
+ {(PR ∂μ/∂y - PQ ∂μ/∂z)
+(QP ∂μ/∂z -QR ∂μ/∂x)+(RQ ∂μ/∂x - RP ∂μ/∂y)}
--> -->
= μ²( X . curl X ) [∵ the term in the second bracket vanishes identically ]
= 0
--> -->
Conversely , suppose (μ X . curl(μ X ) = 0
Then , by the above result ,
--> -->
(1/μ μ X ) . curl(1/μ μ X ) =0
--> -->
X . curl X = 0 (Proved)
--> -->
Conversely , suppose (μ X . curl(μ X ) = 0
Then , by the above result ,
--> -->
(1/μ μ X ) . curl(1/μ μ X ) =0
--> -->
X . curl X = 0 (Proved)
The solution of the PFAFFIAN Differential Equations is the proof of the theorem given below .
Theorem :-
A necessary and sufficient condition that the PFAFFIAN Differential Equation
--> -->
X . dr = 0 is integrable is that
--> -->
X . curl X = 0 .................(7)
--> -->
X . dr = 0 is integrable is that
--> -->
X . curl X = 0 .................(7)
Proof :
Necessary Part :
Suppose that the differential equation
--> -->
X . dr = 0
i.e. P dx + Q dy + R dz = 0 ...........(1)
is integrable . Then there exists a function μ(x,y,z) such that μ(P dx + Q dy + R dz)
is an exact differential dΦ .
Hence we must have
μP = ∂Φ/∂x , μQ = ∂Φ/∂y , μR= ∂Φ/∂z
Now grad Φ = (∂Φ/∂x , ∂Φ/∂y , ∂Φ/∂z)
-->
= (μP , μQ , μR) = μX .
-->
So curl (μX ) = curl (grad Φ) = 0
--> -->
Hence (μΧ ) . curl (μΧ ) = 0
which implies by lemma 2 , that
--> -->
X . curl X = 0
Sufficient Part :
Let z be treated as a constant . Then the differential equation(1) reduces to
P(x,y,z)dx + Q(x,y,z)dy = 0 .......(8)
i.e. dy/dx = -P(x,y,z)/Q(x,y,z)
if Q(x,y,z) ≠ 0.
So , if P and Q are continuous functions of x and y , then equation (8) has a solution of the form
Φ(x,y,z) = c₁ ............(9)
where the constant c₁ may involve z . In differential form equation (9) is
∂Φ/∂x dx + ∂Φ/∂y dy = 0
which should be equivalent to (8) so that
∂Φ/∂x/P = ∂Φ/∂y/Q = μ(x,y,z) (say)
⇒ ∂Φ/∂x = μP , ∂Φ/∂y = μQ ................(10)
Multiplying equation(1) by μ and using equation (10) it can be written as
∂Φ/∂x dx + ∂Φ/∂y dy + ∂Φ/∂z dz +
(μR - ∂Φ/∂z) dz = 0
which is equivalent to
dΦ + Ψ dz = 0 ..........(11)
where Ψ = μR - ∂Φ/∂z ............(12)
--> -->
The given condition X . curl X = 0 implies , by lemma 2 ,
--> -->
(μΧ ) . curl (μΧ ) = 0
But as
-->
μΧ = (μP , μQ , μR)
= (∂Φ/∂x , ∂Φ/∂y , ∂Φ/∂z + Ψ) by (10) and (12)
= (∂Φ/∂x , ∂Φ/∂y ,∂Φ/∂z) + (0,0,Ψ)
= grad Φ + (0,0,Ψ) .
-->
curl (μΧ ) = curl (grad Φ) + curl(0,0,Ψ)
= 0 + (∂Ψ/∂y , -∂Ψ/∂x ,0)
--> -->
Hence 0= (μΧ ) . curl (μΧ )
= (∂Φ/∂x , ∂Φ/∂y , ∂Φ/∂z + Ψ) (∂Ψ/∂y , -∂Ψ/∂x , 0)
= ∂Φ/∂x ∂Ψ/∂y - ∂Φ/∂y ∂Ψ/∂x
= ∂(Φ,Ψ) / ∂(x,y)
It follows from lemma 1 that there exists a relation between Φ and Ψ not involving x and y explicitly but it may involve z . So Ψ may be written as a function Ψ(Φ,z) of Φ and z . The equation (11) assumes the form
dΦ/dz = - Ψ(Φ,z)
which possess a solution of the form
f(Φ,z) = c .............(13)
Substituting for Φ its expression in terms of x,y,z the solution (13) of (11) which is equivalent to (1) is of the form
F(x,y,z) = c
This shows that equation (1) is integrable .
(Proved)
-->
curl (μΧ ) = curl (grad Φ) + curl(0,0,Ψ)
= 0 + (∂Ψ/∂y , -∂Ψ/∂x ,0)
--> -->
Hence 0= (μΧ ) . curl (μΧ )
= (∂Φ/∂x , ∂Φ/∂y , ∂Φ/∂z + Ψ) (∂Ψ/∂y , -∂Ψ/∂x , 0)
= ∂Φ/∂x ∂Ψ/∂y - ∂Φ/∂y ∂Ψ/∂x
= ∂(Φ,Ψ) / ∂(x,y)
It follows from lemma 1 that there exists a relation between Φ and Ψ not involving x and y explicitly but it may involve z . So Ψ may be written as a function Ψ(Φ,z) of Φ and z . The equation (11) assumes the form
dΦ/dz = - Ψ(Φ,z)
which possess a solution of the form
f(Φ,z) = c .............(13)
Substituting for Φ its expression in terms of x,y,z the solution (13) of (11) which is equivalent to (1) is of the form
F(x,y,z) = c
This shows that equation (1) is integrable .
(Proved)
Motivational Quote
"Mathematics Is The Art Of Giving The Same Name To Different Things "
by Henri Poincare
Comments
Post a Comment
If Any Doubt Ask Me